Generative AI, or “Gen AI”, has evolved significantly over the past year and is rapidly shaping the way we create, experience and perceive. Its ability to generate hyper-realistic interactions, photos and videos, and even entire narratives is blurring the line between what’s artificial and what’s real. As we enter 2025, new updates and models are expected that will likely to make Gen AI even more realistic and convincing.

Yet this raises potential ethical, philosophical, and spiritual questions in the world’s second largest religion, Islam. Today, there are over 250 million Muslims in the Asia Pacific region, many of whom are digitally engaged and increasingly affluent given the rising middle class in the region. Reaching these consumers require communications, positioning and marketing strategies that are sensitive to and align with cultural and religious considerations.

Brands deploying Gen AI in Muslim majority markets must understand cultural and religious nuances to be able to navigate potential sensitivities effectively. For instance, the concept of a “Halal”, or religiously permissible, business model. Many will associate the word “Halal” exclusively with dietary restrictions, but the application of what is Halal or not goes deeper and applies to general business practises as well. Rules around Halal business practises include being truthful and transparent about what you can deliver to your clients.

Truthfulness and the pursuit of knowledge are key pillars in the Islamic faith. In fact, the Qur'an specifically warns against falsehood and deception. In Surah Al-Isra, Allah says, "And do not pursue that of which you have no knowledge. Indeed, the hearing, the sight, and the heart—about all those [one] will be questioned" (Qur'an 17:36). In this regard Gen AI poses a potential challenge. The ability to create realistic yet fictional content may be used to spread misinformation, manipulate opinion, and cause harm. The faith considers such misuse a sin and business practices that fail to employ AI ethically would be considered impressible (not Halal) by those who strictly adhere to Islamic business principles, hindering relationship building for those looking to enter Muslim majority markets.

Gen AI has also received some more complicated objections in certain sectors. For example, some observers see parallels between the rise of technology and the conditions preceding the arrival of the Dajjal (Antichrist) in Islamic faith. The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) described the Dajjal as a deceiver, who will mislead humanity with illusions that blur truth and falsehood, making it hard to distinguish between them. In an era where Gen AI can create highly realistic information, it's understandable why some devout followers might be concerned.

This aside, according to the Fatwa Department of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, another possible disadvantage is the technology may lead to the loss of intellectual and interpretive dimension that distinguishes Muslim scholars and experts. There have been attempts to use the technology to issue fatwas (rulings) around specific topics such as death rites, legal issues and the like. Jordanian scholars observed, however, that AI struggles with issuing fatwas as it cannot discern nuanced opinions across Islamic schools of thought, potentially causing confusion. Given the depth of knowledge that exists, Gen AI models would have to be specifically fed information that was not only relevant to the majority sect of the Shariah observant market but also keeps in mind the sub- sects and minority sects that exist. For instance, an AI programme used for generating content for Sunni majority Saudi Arabia could not be effective in Shia majority Iran and vice versa, limiting its effectiveness in providing accurate guidance.

Of course, these concerns are not exclusive to the Islamic faith. According to the 2024 Edelman Trust Barometer, AI is facing a challenge of public confidence. 43% of respondents will reject AI, avoiding products and services that incorporate it, if they believe innovation is being managed poorly. For brands harnessing Gen AI technology to be successful, it is essential they address concerns among their consumers. First, transparency is essential. AI brands must clearly communicate how their technologies work, potential risks and biases, as well as measures to prevent misuse and ambiguity. For instance, AI-generated content must be clearly labelled as such to prevent confusion or be mistaken for something ill intentioned.

In an Islamic context, data sets that are being accessed should be vetted either by ethics councils or cultural experts to ensure that the sources referenced are reliable. If deployed correctly, the technology holds great potential in not only providing Muslims with the means to verify the authenticity of information but also allow those of us operating outside these markets to easily distinguish between reliable and unreliable sources for our own research.

Secondly, AI brands should emphasise ethical use cases that benefit humanity to illustrate how they plan to deploy it for their specific projects. For example, marketing campaigns around public awareness could highlight how Gen AI can be used for educational purposes, medical advancements, or preserving cultural heritage. One that comes to mind is the Dubai government harnessing Gen AI to develop a service dedicated to providing religious guidance under its “10X” initiative, which it also hopes will help counter radicalisation. The principles of compassion, social justice, and community welfare are all deeply rooted in the Islamic faith, and thus demonstration of these can help earn trust and credibility amongst Muslim consumers.

Thirdly, AI companies and those deploying the technology must demonstrate a clear commitment to combating misinformation, fact checking and ensuring that potential biases are addressed. This might include safeguards to prevent the misuse of GenAI for ill-intentioned purposes such as creating fake news or to defraud or taking steps to continually reduce inherent bias in the training data. Gen AI, as observed by researchers at the London School of Economics, is prone to “hallucinations” where it fabricates information and sources. When it comes to Islamic religious research, they observed the AI model cite sources that do not exist which adds to concerns around the deployment of the technology when it comes to heavy research tasks. Brands should take a proactive and public stance in addressing these concerns and communicating their actions to build credibility in markets where ethical and religious considerations hold weight.

Finally, cultural sensitivity is paramount. Marketing materials, product designs, and user interfaces should reflect an understanding of the social and religious context of Islamic markets. For example, avoiding generating content that contradicts Islamic values or appears exploitative of religious themes. Pulling from linguistically diverse sources will also add a layer of added cultural understanding to Gen AI output and show that the technology is being genuinely tailored for the region that it is being deployed in. Gen AI’s role contributing to the rise of increasingly convincing misinformation and criminal activity is presenting concern around the world. According to its 2024 Generative AI in Cybersecurity report by cyber-security firm Deep Instinct, 61% of organisations experienced a rise in deep fake incidents in 2024. In January 2024, an employee at a Hong Kong- based firm sent US$25 million to fraudsters after being ordered to do so by her Chief Financial Officer on a video call that also included other colleagues, who all turned out to be deepfakes. Understandably the pace at which the technology is being developed is rapidly becoming cause for concern as people feel left behind.

However, the ethical and responsible development of Gen AI technology represents a shift in human capability that can deliver many positive benefits. Applications range from democratising education to improving patient care and enhancing sustainability. In a religious context, for instance, it could serve as a useful tool enabling the categorisation and organisation of Islamic fatwas and legal rulings based on scholars or references, as well as help people to verify the veracity of religious information. By emphasising transparency, ethics, combatting misinformation as well as respecting cultural context, brands can earn trust and navigate this evolving landscape. Particularly in predominantly Islamic markets such as Malaysia, Indonesia and the UAE where the unique intersection of faith, culture, and technology requires careful consideration. 

Edelman’s AI Center of Excellence 

Edelman's AI Center of Excellence is a global virtual team which leverages its expertise in trust dynamics to help brands use AI as a reliable, trust-building tool, as well as navigate the communications challenges the technologies presents. Operating as a global virtual network of specialists, the team monitors AI developments closely from different viewpoints to develop insights, solutions, and counsel for clients to navigate this rapidly evolving space. Edelman believes generative AI can revolutionise industries, transforming how we live, work, and interact.

Generative AI, or “Gen AI”, has evolved significantly over the past year and is rapidly shaping the way we create, experience and perceive. Its ability to generate hyper-realistic interactions, photos and videos, and even entire narratives is blurring the line between what’s artificial and what’s real. As we enter 2025, new updates and models are expected that will likely to make Gen AI even more realistic and convincing.

Yet this raises potential ethical, philosophical, and spiritual questions in the world’s second largest religion, Islam. Today, there are over 250 million Muslims in the Asia Pacific region, many of whom are digitally engaged and increasingly affluent given the rising middle class in the region. Reaching these consumers require communications, positioning and marketing strategies that are sensitive to and align with cultural and religious considerations.

Brands deploying Gen AI in Muslim majority markets must understand cultural and religious nuances to be able to navigate potential sensitivities effectively. For instance, the concept of a “Halal”, or religiously permissible, business model. Many will associate the word “Halal” exclusively with dietary restrictions, but the application of what is Halal or not goes deeper and applies to general business practises as well. Rules around Halal business practises include being truthful and transparent about what you can deliver to your clients.

Truthfulness and the pursuit of knowledge are key pillars in the Islamic faith. In fact, the Qur'an specifically warns against falsehood and deception. In Surah Al-Isra, Allah says, "And do not pursue that of which you have no knowledge. Indeed, the hearing, the sight, and the heart—about all those [one] will be questioned" (Qur'an 17:36). In this regard Gen AI poses a potential challenge. The ability to create realistic yet fictional content may be used to spread misinformation, manipulate opinion, and cause harm. The faith considers such misuse a sin and business practices that fail to employ AI ethically would be considered impressible (not Halal) by those who strictly adhere to Islamic business principles, hindering relationship building for those looking to enter Muslim majority markets.

Gen AI has also received some more complicated objections in certain sectors. For example, some observers see parallels between the rise of technology and the conditions preceding the arrival of the Dajjal (Antichrist) in Islamic faith. The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) described the Dajjal as a deceiver, who will mislead humanity with illusions that blur truth and falsehood, making it hard to distinguish between them. In an era where Gen AI can create highly realistic information, it's understandable why some devout followers might be concerned.

This aside, according to the Fatwa Department of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, another possible disadvantage is the technology may lead to the loss of intellectual and interpretive dimension that distinguishes Muslim scholars and experts. There have been attempts to use the technology to issue fatwas (rulings) around specific topics such as death rites, legal issues and the like. Jordanian scholars observed, however, that AI struggles with issuing fatwas as it cannot discern nuanced opinions across Islamic schools of thought, potentially causing confusion. Given the depth of knowledge that exists, Gen AI models would have to be specifically fed information that was not only relevant to the majority sect of the Shariah observant market but also keeps in mind the sub- sects and minority sects that exist. For instance, an AI programme used for generating content for Sunni majority Saudi Arabia could not be effective in Shia majority Iran and vice versa, limiting its effectiveness in providing accurate guidance.

Of course, these concerns are not exclusive to the Islamic faith. According to the 2024 Edelman Trust Barometer, AI is facing a challenge of public confidence. 43% of respondents will reject AI, avoiding products and services that incorporate it, if they believe innovation is being managed poorly. For brands harnessing Gen AI technology to be successful, it is essential they address concerns among their consumers. First, transparency is essential. AI brands must clearly communicate how their technologies work, potential risks and biases, as well as measures to prevent misuse and ambiguity. For instance, AI-generated content must be clearly labelled as such to prevent confusion or be mistaken for something ill intentioned.

In an Islamic context, data sets that are being accessed should be vetted either by ethics councils or cultural experts to ensure that the sources referenced are reliable. If deployed correctly, the technology holds great potential in not only providing Muslims with the means to verify the authenticity of information but also allow those of us operating outside these markets to easily distinguish between reliable and unreliable sources for our own research.

Secondly, AI brands should emphasise ethical use cases that benefit humanity to illustrate how they plan to deploy it for their specific projects. For example, marketing campaigns around public awareness could highlight how Gen AI can be used for educational purposes, medical advancements, or preserving cultural heritage. One that comes to mind is the Dubai government harnessing Gen AI to develop a service dedicated to providing religious guidance under its “10X” initiative, which it also hopes will help counter radicalisation. The principles of compassion, social justice, and community welfare are all deeply rooted in the Islamic faith, and thus demonstration of these can help earn trust and credibility amongst Muslim consumers.

Thirdly, AI companies and those deploying the technology must demonstrate a clear commitment to combating misinformation, fact checking and ensuring that potential biases are addressed. This might include safeguards to prevent the misuse of GenAI for ill-intentioned purposes such as creating fake news or to defraud or taking steps to continually reduce inherent bias in the training data. Gen AI, as observed by researchers at the London School of Economics, is prone to “hallucinations” where it fabricates information and sources. When it comes to Islamic religious research, they observed the AI model cite sources that do not exist which adds to concerns around the deployment of the technology when it comes to heavy research tasks. Brands should take a proactive and public stance in addressing these concerns and communicating their actions to build credibility in markets where ethical and religious considerations hold weight.

Finally, cultural sensitivity is paramount. Marketing materials, product designs, and user interfaces should reflect an understanding of the social and religious context of Islamic markets. For example, avoiding generating content that contradicts Islamic values or appears exploitative of religious themes. Pulling from linguistically diverse sources will also add a layer of added cultural understanding to Gen AI output and show that the technology is being genuinely tailored for the region that it is being deployed in. Gen AI’s role contributing to the rise of increasingly convincing misinformation and criminal activity is presenting concern around the world. According to its 2024 Generative AI in Cybersecurity report by cyber-security firm Deep Instinct, 61% of organisations experienced a rise in deep fake incidents in 2024. In January 2024, an employee at a Hong Kong- based firm sent US$25 million to fraudsters after being ordered to do so by her Chief Financial Officer on a video call that also included other colleagues, who all turned out to be deepfakes. Understandably the pace at which the technology is being developed is rapidly becoming cause for concern as people feel left behind.

However, the ethical and responsible development of Gen AI technology represents a shift in human capability that can deliver many positive benefits. Applications range from democratising education to improving patient care and enhancing sustainability. In a religious context, for instance, it could serve as a useful tool enabling the categorisation and organisation of Islamic fatwas and legal rulings based on scholars or references, as well as help people to verify the veracity of religious information. By emphasising transparency, ethics, combatting misinformation as well as respecting cultural context, brands can earn trust and navigate this evolving landscape. Particularly in predominantly Islamic markets such as Malaysia, Indonesia and the UAE where the unique intersection of faith, culture, and technology requires careful consideration. 

Edelman’s AI Center of Excellence 

Edelman's AI Center of Excellence is a global virtual team which leverages its expertise in trust dynamics to help brands use AI as a reliable, trust-building tool, as well as navigate the communications challenges the technologies presents. Operating as a global virtual network of specialists, the team monitors AI developments closely from different viewpoints to develop insights, solutions, and counsel for clients to navigate this rapidly evolving space. Edelman believes generative AI can revolutionise industries, transforming how we live, work, and interact.

Earlier this evening the Communication Leaders of Chicago honored the Edelman family for its lifetime service to the industry. Below, please read my acceptance speech, which I delivered on behalf of my family.

Chicago is the soul of Edelman. Dan Edelman started the firm with four people in the Merchandise Mart in 1952, He was one of the Greatest Generation, proud of his war time service in psychological warfare, determined to get ahead in the post-war years. He had a big idea, the power of third-party endorsement of products through the new media channel, television. He invented the media tour, putting spokespeople on the road for print, radio and broadcast interviews. My mother Ruth was Dan’s partner in building the company. She would meet and entertain clients and host charity events.

Chicago was the perfect place for an entrepreneur in the 50s and 60s. Edelman served brands that became the essence of family life in America, from Sara Lee to ReaLemon lemon juice to California Wines to Orville Redenbacher popcorn. We grew up with the founders and spokespeople of these companies like Charles Lubin, the little baker from the West Side, who pioneered frozen cakes. Teddy Bensinger gave me a McGregor baseball glove for serving as an unpaid model for his annual report in 1961. My brother John got to sit in the lap of Eva Gabor, spokesperson for California Wines, as she crooned “I was weaned on wine,” in her Hungarian accent.

Chicago was also the crucible of change for a nation bringing meaning to civil rights and struggling with the war in Vietnam. We have been privileged to know the Reverend Jesse Jackson for 50 years, including his two runs for President, which paved the way in 2008 for Barack Obama. My mother attended the trial of the Chicago Eight, leaders of the antiwar movement who came to Chicago to protest during the Democratic National Convention in 1968.

Chicago has been the hub of Edelman’s innovation, which has enabled us to remain family owned and independent. Edelman Digital was spawned doing the first Butterball Turkey Talk-Line online in 1996. Our first experiential work was based in Chicago, the Microsoft Explorasaurus bus touring the country to bring digital to the people. Dan also founded Zeno, Edelman’s sister firm in 1998 in Chicago, with my sister Renée as the founding member. Zeno Chicago is now the largest office in the Zeno network.

Chicago has also been the best expression of the firm’s commitment to the community. My parents were deeply involved in charitable causes, from their board memberships at the Lyric Opera, Art Institute and Immigrant Service League to my mother’s advocacy for Federal mental health funding in partnership with Illinois Senator Paul Simon. More recently, our team worked with the Department of Defense on its Warrior Games program, a multi-sport, adaptive competition for wounded, injured, or ill veterans to enhance their recovery and rehabilitation.

In the past two decades, Chicago has lost its great independent communications firms. Leo Burnett is part of Publicis, Draft and FCB part of IPG. That is not the future for Edelman. To paraphrase Robert Frost, we took the path less traveled and that made all the difference. Walk around the Edelman Museum on Canal Street. See the great work for long time clients such as Starbucks, Unilever, Walmart, and J&J. Understand the impact of Chicagoans in our Hall of Fame, including Pam Talbot, Nancy Ruschienski, Jay Porter, Dom DeFrisco and Betsy Plank.

On behalf of John and Renée and with the promise of continued service to the industry by my three daughters and in memory of my beloved parents who are smiling down on us tonight, I thank Ron Culp for the nomination and the Communication Leaders of Chicago for this incredible honor.

Richard Edelman is CEO.

 

Research Director on 2024 Elections' Lessons in Messaging

Edelman’s Perspectives on 2025 Tipping Points

Equip leaders to act in 2025's high-stakes world by cutting through noise, spotting cultural tipping points, and navigating AI, politics, and polarization.

Find out more

About Us

Find out more

I want to provide context for today’s announcement of the simplification of our firm’s structure.

Our strategy for the past five years has been in two directions. We built an advisory capacity to compete with specialist firms in financial, public affairs, employee engagement and impact. Simultaneously, we also have been building our marketing business, emphasizing earned creative based on action, with ideas that connect with the burgeoning creator economy. We structured our advisory units as boutiques and positioned creative and strategists as dedicated teams.

Clients now require integration of specialist services into the larger firm for speedy access to our geographic reach, deep industry knowledge and creative ability. We are best when we bring the full force of Edelman to the complex problems facing our clients. Corporate affairs, marketing and government affairs are now all closely aligned on the client side. We are skating to where the puck will be — everything is interconnected now.

Edelman is the leading integrated communications advisory firm, operating at the intersection of culture and commerce. We are going to focus on the five industry sectors — health, technology, food & beverage, financial services, and energy transition. We will sunset the Edible, Revere, Salutem, Mustache, EGA and Delta brands. We will maintain two client specific entities — Assembly for Microsoft and Kinisi for J&J. Conflicts will be managed by our sister firms Zeno and RUTH. DXI, Smithfield and UEG will be connective tissue between Edelman and Zeno in the DJE family.

We have always been dedicated to excellence in client service. We must remain nimble and agile in delivering on our clients’ needs with senior people leading every engagement. As part of today’s simplification, we will be parting ways with 330 colleagues across our global network — 5.3% of our total workforce. I want to thank them for their service to the firm and our clients.

I am deeply optimistic about the future of Edelman. We are a $1 billion revenue business, 5,870 employees strong. We are ideally suited for a world of geopolitical uncertainty, the proper role of business in societal issues, and dispersion of authority away from experts. We maintain our 60-office network as a dramatic competitive advantage. Our creative and strategy teams have broken the glass ceiling with ideas premised on action. We are investing in our own large language model premised on 25 years of Trust data that enables AI as a predictive tool, both communications and action, enabling better decisions by business related to trust. We are working on the most important challenges including advising the food industry on labelling, on the acceptance of artificial intelligence as a trusted partner in society, and the potential of immunology in disease treatment and prevention. We are launching the 25th Edelman Trust Barometer in Davos next month, looking at trust in institutions after 50 elections that involved over half of the world’s population.

I look forward to a strong performance in 2025.

Richard Edelman is CEO.

 

Gen-Z have complex feelings about the future. 

The Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Trust at Work  data shows that the youngest Gen-Z are incredibly pessimistic in their outlook, while the oldest Gen-Z are incredibly optimistic. This intra-generational optimism gap is far greater than that between employees of different income levels, sexes, and political leanings, highlighting a fascinating data-driven contrast to the stereotype of Gen-Z as a doom-and-gloom generation.
 

For Economic Optimism, Income Doesn't Matter, But Age Does


While Gen-Z are in fact more optimistic than other age groups – 67% agree that they and their family will be better off in five years – only 39% of corporate associates (entry-level employees and experienced non-managers, many of whom are Gen-Z) are as optimistic. This demonstrates a key finding: 
 

The most misunderstood optimism gap is within Gen-Z itself.

On the one hand, this does not come as much of surprise considering the factors. Many younger Gen-Zers are university students and recent graduates whose studies were reshaped by the challenges brought out by COVID-19. Many are experiencing their first “normal” work environment at a time when employees of all generations are withdrawing from the in-person work cultures that may have traditionally generated that optimism.

On the other hand, pessimism is not inherent to Gen-Z, and it would be both unfair and inaccurate to ascribe pessimism to the whole generation. The oldest members of Gen-Z are better equipped to navigate the evolving hybrid workplace and have become more optimistic as they grow into mid-level manager roles in their mid-to-late-twenties. Over time, it could be fair to expect that all Gen-Z can become similarly likely to trust their employer and take on additional work – the youngest members of Gen-Z just need time.
 

At the heart of Gen-Z’s intra-generational optimism gap is the employer-employee relationship. 

The Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Trust at Work shows that amidst a lack of trust in public institutions, employers have filled the void, becoming not only the most trusted institution of all, but also the most reliable indicator of economic optimism generally. It follows that employers owe these youngest Gen-Z employees the benefit of the doubt. Employers must aim to better understand the nuances of this generation, harness the potential of all Gen-Z employees, and invest in Gen-Z’s skill development, empowering them to take ownership of their roles and engage more deeply with their work. 

 

Through Career Pathing, Impact, and Agency, Employers Can Close the Economic Optimism Gap


Addressing the optimism gap among the youngest Gen-Z employees will not be easy, nor will it happen overnight. But it could create a ripple effect across the labour force and broader society. As highlighted by the Trust Barometer, economic optimism correlates strongly with trust in institutions, motivation, and employee engagement, which collectively improves society’s overall outlook.
 

Gen-Z are the young professionals of today and the leaders of tomorrow.

Gen-Z's level of economic optimism provides a valuable indicator of the health of our workforce and society. While the economic pessimism often associated with Gen-Z is not unfounded, neither is it pervasive at both ends of the age spectrum. 

With time and proper investment, many members of this complex generation could develop the respect, patience, and agency they are encouraged to cultivate.

 

 


 

About Gen Z Lab

Gen Z Lab is Edelman's global offering comprising Gen Z employees, a roster of internal and external on-call advisors, and data hub dedicated to generational insights.

To learn more about the Gen Z Lab, please reach out to Catherine Santos

 

The Future of Asian Newsrooms

We are pleased to continue our partnership with the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism's annual Digital News Report 2024, which is the largest study into news consumption habits globally.

Find out more

The Pew Research Center is out with a fascinating new report on America’s News Influencers. These are the people with at least 100,000 followers on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X or YouTube who regularly write about current events.

This new and highly influential group of podcasters matters more than ever because of the dramatic fragmentation and decline in trust of traditional media and the collapse of viewership on cable TV. MSNBC and CNN are now at 25-year lows in viewership. MSNBC has 45,000 and CNN has 65,000 viewers in the 25-54 age group as of last week. CNN is down from 560,000 viewers as of September 2020. Meanwhile, Fox News now has nearly 75 percent of cable news viewers.

These influencers are most likely to be posting on X (85 percent), followed by Instagram (50 percent) and YouTube (44 percent). By two to one, the influencers are male, and slightly more likely to identify as Republican than Democrat (27 percent vs. 21 percent). The topics they most often discuss are politics (43 percent), social issues (21 percent), international issues (18 percent), technology (5 percent) and the economy (5 percent). Only 16 percent of them have experience in the news industry, and three quarters are seeking to monetize their presence on social channels via subscription, donation, or merchandise.

According to Pew, 20 percent of Americans report getting their news from these influencers; 37 percent of those are under 30 years old. Seven in 10 said that the news they get from influencers is at least somewhat different from the information they get from other sources. One key finding is the confirmation of thought bubbles; far more respondents say they mostly agree with what they see (30 percent) versus what they disagree with (2 percent). This existence of confirmation bias has contributed to the incredible growth and effectiveness of news influencers. Influencer Marketing as a practice has always been used in this way - brands partner with influencers who align with their target audience's values or interests, which then allows the influencers to validate and reinforce consumers' beliefs by endorsing the brand or product.

Here is a list, in no particular order, of some of the most prominent news influencers from the Edelman Public Affairs Unit for both Conservative and Liberal constituencies:

Conservative

  • Joe Rogan
  • Tim Pool
  • Candace Owens
  • Steven Crowder
  • Charlie Kirk
  • Elon Musk
  • The Daily Wire (Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh)
  • Benny Johnson
  • The Hodgetwins
  • Dan Bongino
  • Megyn Kelly
  • OutKick Network (Clay Travis, Collin Rugg, Buck Sexton)

Liberal

  • Ethan Klein
  • Hasan Piker
  • The Young Turks
  • Pod Save America (Jon Favreau)
  • David Pakman
  • MeidasTouch (Ron Filipkowski)
  • Molly Jong-Fast
  • Brian Tyler Cohen
  • Mary Trump
  • The Lincoln Project

The essential question for communicators is whether to put CEOs or CMOs in front of these influencers. As a matter of PR practice, it is our responsibility to find channels that reach large audiences. I spoke to Edelman Vice Chair Nikki Haley this morning and her advice is as follows: “Americans are looking for news sources that provide truth and common sense. They want to learn something. They are choosing what they want to hear instead of waiting for a network to program it. Podcasts now must be considered as a critical component of media strategy.” She just hosted Charlamagne tha God on her own podcast to discuss why minority groups shifted to Trump in this past election.

Business podcasts more often focus on entrepreneurs and technology, including Harvard Business Review and TED. The political news influencers will move toward business coverage in the coming months. Smart CCOs will advocate first for sit-downs with smart observers of the scene such as Scott Galloway of The Prof G Pod podcast. Galloway is a moderate and can address issues such as DEI and sustainability without political overtones. These new news influencers should be included in media plans over time on topics such as in-sourcing, upskilling, support for entrepreneurs and American optimism. They are no longer the future; they are the new normal.

Richard Edelman is CEO.

Subscribe to 2024